Your morning update from Salon.

Crash Course subscribers can join the conversation. Tap the speech bubble icon to leave a comment. Click the heart to leave a like.

The news, in brief …

  • “Real unfortunate”: KBJ torches SCOTUS conservatives using shadow docket to aid Trump

    The liberal justice said that emergency rulings were "not serving this country well." Read more.

  • Trump’s “unpredictable” war in Iran has no end in sight

    Analysts see the possibility of escalation, collapse, or negotiation, while stability remains elusive. Read more.

  • Why Pete Hegseth talks like he’s in an action movie

    The defense secretary's bro-y tone is borrowed from blockbusters. Read more.

Make me smarter …

Lindsey Graham is the little war devil on Trump’s shoulder

The South Carolina senator and noted war hawk pushed Trump on Iran. Now he says "Cuba is next." Read more.

An Ed Hardy fashion show in 2024. (Getty Images)

First as tragedy, then as washed…

We refuse to learn a lesson from what happened to Francis Fukuyama.

With the Soviet Union in terminal decline, the political science scholar became famous for declaring that we had reached the “end of history.” As the Cold War ended and the world went unipolar, Fukuyama inhaled some spice – delivered just-in-time from some far off manufacturer – and saw the thousand-year-reign of a neoliberal global order laid out before him. He trumpeted the triumph of liberalism, even as he admitted that the idea of having no new ideological battles worth fighting was a bummer.

That theory came crashing down at the turn of the century with the Sept. 11 attacks and the beginning of the War on Terror. The decades since have been marked by a global backlash against U.S. hegemony specifically and liberal democracy more generally.

Still, more than halfway through the 2020s, it’s tough to shake the pervasive feeling of being stuck in a holding pattern. Social media users have been debating our supposed cultural stagnation for the last several days, thanks to a post by an account named Sturgeon’s Law claiming that there had been almost no innovation in pop culture in recent memory.

“No new genres of music, etc. So much modern culture is backward-looking & revivalist, to an unprecedented extent relative to past eras that also involved revivals,” they wrote. “Something is happening we don't fully understand yet.”

The hit dogs of Gen Z hollered into the void in response, accusing “Sturgeon” of being over-the-hill and out of touch, but without offering an example of something that is actually new and broadly popular. Zoomers are paying top dollar for vintage mall-brand takes on the blingy couture of the early ‘00s. The pop stars of the late aughts are still the biggest stars in 2026. The rap mainstream, which tends to innovate much faster than its pop and country cousins, has been flitting between microvariations on the sounds pioneered by Chief Keef and Young Thug before many Gen Z listeners entered grade school. Another silver-spoon president is marching us into a Middle East war that nobody wants.

This topic of everything in culture being old and boring has energized plenty of cultural commentators. Critics at The Atlantic and The New Republic have taken a crack at it. Author W. David Marx wrote an entire book about the phenomenon, a cultural history of the last two decades called “Blank Space.” The causes of this alleged collapse vary — the crumbling of newspaper criticism and the rise of poptimism, the internet fracturing the monoculture, late capitalism, rising housing costs — but the conclusions are pretty much the same: Culture has stopped moving forward and is waiting around to die.

Of course, there’s nothing new about this critique either. Marxist culture critic Frederic Jameson was saying something similar in 1984, arguing that the victory of global capitalism would create a culture entirely built on pastiche. Philosopher Jacques Derrida was writing in 1993 about culture being endlessly haunted by the past. Pop critic Simon Reynolds claimed in 2011 that music’s past was calcifying while its future was collapsing. All three of those guys, let’s note, were already on the far side of 40 at the time.

The idea that history is stalling out is perfect fodder for an endless internet debate, since every possible response just inspires more questions. Has pop culture pulled out of a similar tailspin in earlier cycles? Does cultural innovation need to be fostered or will it spring up naturally in each new generation? Is culture ending, or are you just old?

Where do you land? Click the speech bubble icon to leave a comment.

Was Crash Course worth your time today?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Support the progressive journalism you trust. Become a Salon member today!

Before you go …

Trump’s moral crusade is dangerous for America — and the world

The president casts himself as the ultimate authority on good and evil — and believes it is his job to enforce it. Read more.

ALSO FROM SALON
Standing Room Only

Standing Room Only

Amanda Marcotte's biweekly politics newsletter for Salon readers who like to be plugged in and a little bit rowdy.

In partnership with

Stop Drowning In AI Information Overload

Your inbox is flooded with newsletters. Your feed is chaos. Somewhere in that noise are the insights that could transform your work—but who has time to find them?

The Deep View solves this. We read everything, analyze what matters, and deliver only the intelligence you need. No duplicate stories, no filler content, no wasted time. Just the essential AI developments that impact your industry, explained clearly and concisely.

Replace hours of scattered reading with five focused minutes. While others scramble to keep up, you'll stay ahead of developments that matter. 600,000+ professionals at top companies have already made this switch.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading