Hey, remember libertarians?

The news, in brief…

• Predator drones are monitoring anti-ICE protests

  Democratic lawmakers say the Trump administration's use of drones to track its critics is "dangerous.” Read more.

Make me smarter …

RFK Jr’s war on vaccines is about shaming women, not helping kids

The MAHA movement regards all childhood ailments as a sign that moms are failing. Read more.

The right plays dumb on Trump’s censors

It’s not easy playing both a libertarian and a supporter of President Donald Trump. Here you have an administration that, more than any other in American history, rests and wriggles on the whims of one man who would be king — who, indeed, asserts a unique and unchallenged right to insert himself into every aspect of American life.

Trump’s is not a night-watchman state, limiting itself to simply arbitrating property disputes between the idealized robber barons of an Ayn Rand novel, but an interventionist busybody that quite simply cannot mind its own business. From a White House toilet, the U.S. president publishes dictates on everything from the plaques at historical museums (can’t we make slavery seem, I don’t know: better?) to the way players return kicks at NFL games (no “Sissy Football” says a man who opposes the concept of exercise).

To be a libertarian and MAGA requires a good deal of pretending not to see what the American state is up to. It also, from time to time, demands a good, principled denunciation, lest the man of principle (these are libertarians: it’s almost always a man) be accused of condoning some glaring contradictions.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., decided over the weekend that it was time for one of those periodic displays of not standing for it.

“Absolutely inappropriate,” Paul said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” when asked about the Trump administration pressuring another late-night comedian off the air. “Brendan Carr has got no business weighing in on this,” he said, referring to the MAGA FCC chairman who had told ABC that it could remove Jimmy Kimmel from its evening lineup itself, billed as “the easy way,” or big government would have to step in and do it “the hard way.”

Kimmel’s offense, ostensibly, was wrongly attributing the assassination of Charlie Kirk to a member of Trump’s MAGA movement; police have not established a motive. But Trump had long sought the removal of Kimmel — whose remarks centered not on the political identity of the killer, but how Jeffrey Epstein’s former friend was quick to exploit the murder — just as he had the cancellation of Stephen Colbert. Following ABC’s decision to indefinitely suspend the offending comic (bringing him back tonight, the network announced, after facing an expensive backlash), Trump again argued that it should be “really illegal” for any media outlet to criticize him too much.

Good for Paul, then, calling this out. But then he continued, driving home how playing a MAGA libertarian in 2025 also requires playing rather dumb.

“People have to also realize that despicable comments — you have the right to say them, but you don’t have the right to employment,” Paul said. In the private marketplace of ideas, he argued, an employee can be summarily fired if the boss doesn’t like it. “The FCC should have nothing to do with it,” he said. “But I do think that, you know, a couple of the networks pulled out. Sinclair pulled. They were disgusted by the comment. That’s their right.”

Libertarians like Paul have consistently embraced the concept of private tyranny, where one’s employer is entitled to rule as a strongman, but this is not even that. The corporate disgust that Paul cited was only aired after the chairman of the FCC — the government agency that has the power to approve or deny corporate mergers — issued his ultimatum. After that, Nexstar Media Group, which owns a slew of local ABC affiliates, said it would no longer air “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”

Does Nexstar have a $6.2 billion merger on the line, requiring FCC approval, you might ask? Yes, it does!

“Nexstar needs Brendan Carr’s help to get this deal across the finish line, and not only that, it needs the agency to change the rules around broadcast ownership limits to allow for it to happen,” Politico’s John Hendel explained.

It has always been a bit of a farce, the way America’s libertarians speak up for “freedom” only when the government is explicitly involved. But in this case, even when the government is crudely threatening its opponents over speech it wishes to squash, the reply is: companies are free to do what the state censor wants, and we, the defenders of liberty in this age of Trump-branded tyranny, are free to believe in coincidences.

What do you think? Are mainstream media companies engaging in self-censorship to curry favor with the administration? Click the speech bubble to sound off in the comments.

Support our bold journalism: Become a Salon member today.

Before you go …

GOP’s “free speech” law leaves students afraid to talk

Ohio students tell Salon they're not feeling any freer after Republicans passed an overhaul of higher education. Read more.

ALSO FROM SALON

In partnership with

The Daily Newsletter for Intellectually Curious Readers

Join over 4 million Americans who start their day with 1440 – your daily digest for unbiased, fact-centric news. From politics to sports, we cover it all by analyzing over 100 sources. Our concise, 5-minute read lands in your inbox each morning at no cost. Experience news without the noise; let 1440 help you make up your own mind. Sign up now and invite your friends and family to be part of the informed.

Join for free today!