In partnership with

Your morning update from Salon.

Crash Course subscribers can join the conversation. Click the speech bubble to leave a comment. Tap the heart to leave a like.

Today’s top story …

Trump’s catering-truck farce

Trump usually directs the food spectacle. The reported catering-truck escape briefly made him part of the scenery. Read more.

Make me smarter …

Bernie Sanders’ AI warnings are being ignored in the Senate

Like Helaena Targaryen from "House of the Dragon," the Vermont senator is sounding an alarm that won't be heard. Read more.

We have a mechanism to punish corporations that harm us. We should use it

I’m a huge fan of the corporate death penalty, a legal process in which a corporation is forced to dissolve or stop existing. (It’s actually the only death penalty I support, because the state executing humans isn’t just unethical, it doesn’t work to deter homicides. But unlike what the Supreme Court believes, I don’t think of corporations as human.) More formally known as judicial dissolution, the corporate death penalty basically happens when the government is so pissed off by the corruption or damage a corporation causes that it yanks away their charter. 

The mechanism has existed since at least the 19th century, but it has only been used a few times, usually in response to severe environmental destruction. In 1890 the North River Sugar Refining Corporation was dissolved by New York’s highest court on grounds it was abusing its power as a corporation. The judge’s opinion contains this little gem: “The life of a corporation is indeed less than that of the humblest citizen…” 

My, how times have changed!

It’s hard to find any modern examples of the corporate death penalty, but that doesn’t mean critics of abusive business haven’t attempted to invoke it. Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Equifax and even the National Rifle Association of America have all been the target of calls for the corporate death penalty. 

While those calls for action haven’t resulted in much action, it’s still fun to fantasize about which corporations should face execution. Perhaps there should be a reckoning for Flock Safety, whose mass surveillance devices have spread like a plague through communities, which are ripe for abuse from police and riddled with false positives. Or we could break up Amazon for a million reasons. But to pick one from this month, the company is planning to build a power plant (for fueling data centers, naturally) that is so large it threatens to instantly become the country’s largest polluter. That seems like a decent rationale. Taylor Farms would certainly top the list for anyone glued to a toilet bowl lately, thanks to the company’s alleged indiscretion handling lettuce laced with the “explosive diarrhea” parasite.

In another universe, one in which Donald Trump didn’t secure a second term, he may have been convicted of the fraud he was accused of and his companies could have been liquidated by using the corporate death penalty. Indeed, people were floating the idea before the 2024 election, which allowed Trump to dodge the numerous lawsuits against him that may have resulted in total dissolution of his businesses. It could still happen one day, but it doesn’t seem likely any time soon. 

Much like jury nullification, another legal mechanism that is not widely known, there is a reason the corporate death penalty isn’t part of the Overton window, the range of acceptable discourse in the mainstream public. The corporate death penalty is the kind of thing that keeps the ultra-rich scared. It’s why corporate shills love to make the excuse that the corporate death penalty will unfairly punish employees and bring shocks to the economy. More likely, it would persuade big business to pursue due diligence instead of profits over people and the environment.

In yet another universe, we would restructure corporations to have more than one bottom line beyond their shareholders. So-called public benefit corporations do actually exist, and with a triple bottom line: a dedication to people, planet and profit, essentially in that order. Corporate responsibility could encompass so much more than making the stock market rise. There are approximately 10,000 of these entities in the U.S. It’s difficult to get an exact number of corporations in the U.S., but the IRS flagged 6.8 million active corporate returns filed in 2022, so to say there’s a big gap in ideology here is a major understatement. 

Corporations aren’t people — they’re technology. And if our corporate law is actually outdated and destructive tech, maybe we should update it. Don’t worry, the rich will still make plenty more than they need, but it doesn’t have to come at the expense of everyone else.—Troy Farah

Send me a note about what you want to see here: [email protected] or say hello on Blue Sky.

Was Crash Course worth your time today?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Summer Sale! Support Salon's bold journalism. Become a member and save 58%

Before you go …

Karoline Leavitt is leaving her post as White House press secretary

The number of women left in the Trump admin is shrinking. Read more.

Privacy-first email. Built for real protection.

Proton Mail offers what others won’t:

  • End-to-end encryption by default

  • Zero access to your data

  • Open-source and independently audited

  • Based in Switzerland with strong privacy laws

  • Free to start, no ads

We don’t scan your emails. We don’t sell your data. And we don’t make you dig through settings to find basic security. Proton is built for people who want control, not compromise.

Simple, secure, and free.

ALSO FROM SALON
Standing Room Only

Standing Room Only

Amanda Marcotte's weekly politics newsletter for Salon readers who like to be plugged in and a little bit rowdy.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate