Your morning update from Salon.

Crash Course subscribers can join the conversation. Click the speech bubble to leave a comment. Tap the heart to leave a like.

The Massachusetts mother badly needed mental health treatment. America staged a show trial instead. Read more.

Silicon Valley billionaires hope to buy their way out of democracy. Read more.

The Supreme Court Justice has made millions from companies that profit from our planet’s destruction

Most readers will be familiar with Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, very likely thanks to his majority opinion on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which destroyed the constitutional right to abortion in the U.S., or his weird flag-waving during the “Stop the Steal” movement. But Alito’s entanglements with the fossil fuel industry are also worth scrutinizing, especially as the Supreme Court prepares to hear a case on whether fossil fuel companies can be held responsible for the damages of climate change. 

In 2018, the city and county of Boulder, Colorado, sued oil and gas giants Suncor and ExxonMobil, alleging that they were responsible for the greenhouse gas emissions that are heating the planet and making Colorado less livable. The extreme heat is causing dwindling snowpack in the state, with far-reaching impacts on agriculture and water supply, not to mention the multi-billion dollar ski industry. The Supreme Court will hear arguments Oct. 5 on whether or not these corporations can be held responsible for this ongoing crisis.

Alito has refused to recuse himself from the case, which is interesting given his apparent conflicts of interest. A Forbes report on Monday analyzed Alito’s newly released 2025 financial disclosures, which reveal a stock portfolio chock-full of investments in the oil, gas and energy sectors. Forbes estimates Alito’s net worth at approximately $10 million, of which up to $2.9 million comes from his fossil fuel industry investments between 2005 and 2024, citing a recent analysis from the judicial watchdog group Court Accountability. Alito is still only the second-richest justice on the court, behind Chief Justice John Roberts, Forbes notes, but Roberts and Alito are the only two justices on the court who hold stocks in individual companies.

Some of the companies that Alito has invested in include ConocoPhillips, Woodside Energy Group, OGE Energy Corp., and Black Hills Corp. Notably, none of these are Suncor or ExxonMobil. Alito sold his Exxon shares years ago! So what’s the big deal?

Reading between the lines, it seems obvious that Alito would have some degree of complicity if ExxonMobil and Suncor were found liable in the Colorado case. Of course, knowing which way this court leans, that seems extremely unlikely, despite the solid scientific evidence (Consensus! Rarest of things!) that fossil fuel companies are overwhelmingly driving our climate crisis. Even people who work at these companies, or who run them, seem to understand this, but that hasn’t stopped them from employing every tactic possible to avoid responsibility. It’s our climate change-denying president and his “hoax”-echoing acolytes that are the real anomaly here and they just don’t have the evidence to back up their claims that it’s just a little warming.

A melting glacier in Nepal just killed more than 1,200 people, with thousands still missing. Recent flash flooding in Arizona swept through the Grand Canyon, killing at least two people, which was exacerbated by wildfire scarring, drought and warming temperatures in the Pacific Ocean. At least 35,000 excess deaths have been linked to the scorching heat waves in Europe over the summer, though that is likely an undercount. All of these disasters have been intensified by how we are heating the planet by burning fossil fuels. Climate change is not some abstract problem. It has a real human cost. 

The good news is that it may be getting easier to sue the companies responsible, especially as the evidence becomes more undeniable. Mother Jones recently reported that “oil and gas groups are facing a wave of lawsuits. Over 40 cases in the United States filed by states, municipalities, and tribal governments have been brought against Big Oil since 2017.” We’ll have to see how these suits pan out, but in the meantime, raising a stink about this toxic corruption, subsidized by our government, is the best we can do, aside from voting for candidates who vow to pursue liability.

So if ExxonMobil, Suncor and all the rest are guilty of damaging our planet — and we know they are — it’s very arguable that so are individual investors like Alito, who profit handsomely from the extractive industries that are causing climate change. Whether that’s a criminal act or not may be difficult to prove in court, but why would Alito want to risk implicating himself in the future? It would surprising if he didn’t rule in favor of Big Oil on any such case.

The Supreme Court can align itself with the fossil fuel agenda and deny reality if it so chooses (nothing new there) but someday there will be real accountability for these crimes against the environment, whether that means punishment for climate criminals or the natural consequences of unnatural warming, i.e., erasing humanity’s presence on this planet. I know which one I’d choose. —Troy Farah

What do you think? Does Sam have a conflict of interest here? Are climate disaster deaths no big deal? Leave us a comment, send me a note with your thoughts at [email protected] or say hello on Bluesky.

Support our progressive journalism. Become a Premium member today.

Independent medical groups are filling the void left by Trump’s health agenda. Read more.

Over 4 million people have had the same lightbulb moment.

Morning Brew is a free daily newsletter that breaks down what's happening in business, finance, and tech — clearly, quickly, and with enough personality to make it the best email in your inbox.

No yelling. No filler. Just the news, finally making sense.

Try it for free